Building 109's area (illustrated a A lower right), was examined and documented. "Drainage is being released on your property, this is absolutely forbidden"

The developer's statement of allowance was provided. A observation referencing a Societal Breakdown was the response.

A Governmental Slope and Retention Pond, (center), was extensively examined and documented.

An initial observation firmed; "The slope is too steep and it will never stop deteriorating" He asked "Was there a forest here before?" Yes. "This Is Not American Engineering"

The engineer diligently sought specific engineering plans, navigating the State, County, and City offices in West Virginia with expertise. During this process,he not only located necessary documents at the City of Bridgeport but also took the time to explain the relationship between law and the symbolic significance of the county courthouse. Promised copies of the plans were to be delivered within days, allowing the engineer to return to Munich, Germany, on November 1, 2011, where he awaited the scheduled delivery of these crucial documents.

The Plans Were Not Delivered.

After submitting multiple Freedom of Information Requests to various government officials, the engineering plans were finally obtained from the City of Bridgeport around November 18, 2011. These documents were then promptly forwarded to Munich, Germany, completing the engineer's effort to secure the necessary information for their project while overseas.

 In late March 2012, we received a concerning message from Germany indicating that the engineering plans for the slope and retention pond were entirely ignored, leading to a devaluation of our property due to significant structural defects.

The message detailed how the Original Area, previously deemed unsuitable by a regulatory agency, had been revisited with the involvement of government partners, including the City of Bridgeport and the State of West Virginia, resulting in the allocation of substantial taxpayer dollars. Unfortunately, the project led to the destruction of a stabilizing forest and the creation of a structurally deficient developmental support slope and storm drainage system, Reminiscent of past failures on our property but now exacerbated by broader geographical and political ramifications.

On April 9, 2012

On April 9, 2012 a local newspaper published an articl

The article's unclear references have seemingly obscured the specific location of the area in question, leading to confusion about the costs associated with cosmetic repairs to the support slope and storm drainage retention system, a topic initially raised in 2007. Furthermore, it highlights the government's controversial strategy to shift overall liability to their business partner, Platinum Properties, raising concerns about accountability and the implications for local stakeholders affected by the ongoing structural issues.

Note: Lifelong resident Frank Lacaria expressed grave concerns about the water discharging from the storm drainage retention pond, noting that it is incapable of sustaining life, as evidenced by the immediate death of small fish and frogs. He suggested that the destabilization efforts had unleashed previously dormant contaminants into this water source, impacting not only the local ecosystem but potentially extending the consequences to surrounding areas, raising alarms about environmental safety and public health.

Corporate Responsibility and Liability

 The government should not entrust the future of taxpayer-funded construction projects to private companies, particularly in a region marked by a history of reactionary agreements, frequent ownership changes, and quitclaim or deed transfers. Such a Precedent raises concerns about accountability and the long-term viability of projects, suggesting a need for more robust oversight and commitment to the public interest rather than reliance on volatile private partnerships.