The Odyssey
Odd Encounters
BIO
Mid Swings
The Immigrant
The Son
The
Mine Map
The Grandson
Stop
Go
The Warnings
The
Reasons
The Why
The
Realities
The Rezoners
The Recovery
The Complaint
Platinum
109 & 113 Incidents
The Partners
The Engagement
The Slope Incidents
The Big Picture
The Bigger Picture
The Drawing
Zoning
Q's
De-Valuations Qs
Crumble
Q's
Regulations
Drainage
Lateral
Supports
Due Diligence
Interests
Medias
Questions |
|
|
|
|
|
The Partners Engage Phase B
The Bigger Squeeze Play |
These
illustrations supplements
Previously
Provided information.

1996:
The Upper Plateau Area was characterized by its environmental balance and
isolation from neighboring properties. Area 1
highlights the original upper retention pond that was eliminated before the
image was captured, indicating a significant change in the landscape. Meanwhile,
Area 2 points out that the designated land was
Insufficient to accommodate the proposed
Planned development of 109 and 113 Platinum Drive.
|
|
The December 31, 2002,
image aligns with my
Notification to the authorities regarding significant developments in the
Upper Plateau Area. Number 1 clearly depicts
the landscape after the removal of the previously existing retention pond,
highlighting the environmental changes that occurred.
Number 2 shows Buildings 109 and 113 Platinum Drive, which were
constructed under compromised conditions, as they had been
"forced in" despite the area’s
limitations, raising concerns about planning and its impact on the surrounding
environment.

Number 3
indicates that before the construction of Buildings 109 and 113 Platinum Drive,
the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)
Halted Excavations by Platinum Properties
in this specific area, citing their actions would "bring
the whole valley down."
Number 4
contrasts this by showcasing the untouched rainforest greenery that previously
thrived in the region.
Together, these images illustrate the transition of an environmentally sensitive
area that had never been logged before, which was set to be logged in 2003-2004
and subsequently altered in May 2005 through the combined efforts of Platinum
Properties, the City of Bridgeport, and the State of West Virginia, raising
significant environmental concerns.
The partnered engagements in the area
Dramatically
Disrupted drainage patterns all points east toward Legacy Bridgeport, as we
used hay bales and iron pipes to redirect drainage. This work was carried out by
Anthony Lacaria, his wife Valerie and his father Frank Lacaria.

|
|

In May of 2005, the
partners initiated a taxpayer-funded project that led to the construction of the
Corpening Drive Retention Pond, depicted in Number 6,
which was strategically situated at the base of the Partner's Large Support
Slope, shown in Number 5.

By 2003, Platinum
Properties held the City of Bridgeport jointly responsible for the dangerously
unstable
Non-Supported Slope
at the rear of 113 Platinum Drive, as noted in Note 1.
This poorly designed Man-Made Loose
Support slope not only supported two buildings but also concealed multiple
buried utilities, posing significant safety risks and raising concerns about the
integrity of the site and the potential hazards associated with the buried
infrastructure.
In May of 2005, the State of West Virginia and Platinum Properties transferred
the blueprints and full responsibility for the major support slope and drainage
system of their expansion to their partner, the City of Bridgeport, which is a
lower asset form of government. Ironically, this is the same city that Platinum
Properties had previously held jointly responsible for the unstable Non-Support
Slope at 113 Platinum Drive, highlighting a troubling circularity in
accountability.
|
|
A time specific video:
|
|

The City of Bridgeport
was subsequently tasked with managing a similar, albeit much larger, slope
situation, as evidenced by the July 2011 image depicting the Corpening Drive
Storm Drainage System, which has endured years of neglect and abandonment. Said Abandonment of a
non-engineered design led to the only
logical outcome. Said Retention Pond's failure in August of 2011 Follwed by
Extensive Evaluations in
October of 2011.
|
|
|
|
The highlighted areas in the
image below are of the upper plateau mentioned on the 2014
Storm Drainage Page.

By 2013, the City of Bridgeport
had been designated as the responsible party for the Corpening Drive Storm
Drainage Retention Pond; however, this designation does not guarantee that the
pond will remain resilient against future failures.
Please Refer To Past Notices And Historic Warnings:
2005:
Reference
One:
Partnered Endeavor
2010:
Reference Two:
Oversight
2010:
Reference Three:
Deficiencies
2011:
Reference
Four:
Public Notification
2014:
Reference Five: The Aforementioned
|
|
|