|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Odyssey Odd Encounters BIO Mid Swings
The Drawing De-Valuations Qs
Medias Questions
|
Devaluations lay
a historical timeline in hopes of answering the following Questions.
The situation describes a complex interplay between local officials, property developers, and a family that has owned their land for generations. It highlights the tensions that can arise when municipal interests clash with the rights and values of long-term property owners. Mason Steele's frustration over drainage runoff reflects the broader concerns of local governance impacting residents and their properties. Rich Lane's dismissive comment about the land being "worthless" suggests an attitude that prioritizes developmental goals over community value and heritage.
The quote from the German engineer on the front page of Hergoot underscores a significant concern about the impact of aggressive devaluation tactics on property owned by residents, pointing to a broader trend of diminishing property values in areas marked as suburbs. The reference to a 2014 memorandum that highlights warnings regarding rapidly decreasing property values suggests a persistent issue to raise critical questions about the motivations behind such strategies, including whether they are intended to facilitate property acquisition for development at the expense of long-standing property owners and their intrinsic value.
The documentation of three written and two oral manifestations regarding property devaluations presents a clear timeline and pattern of concerns associated with the development of 109 and 113 Platinum Drive. These manifestations—occurring both before and after construction—The initial written manifestations prior to the developer's engagement signal early warnings about potential devaluation, while subsequent oral and written testimonies after construction demonstrate ongoing concerns that arose from the new developments, particularly relating to the Corpening Drive slope and retention pond.
Question 3 of the 2011 Q&A asks: Were you being pressured to sue? We were put under inexplicable duress to get some type of reaction and a suit may have been one reaction vested interests were hoping for. However, a suit did not materialize, their designed-in construction flaws did not act accordingly and backfired with a vengeance. The mention of the world-renowned professional's warning from October 2011 about the prohibition of drainage release onto neighboring properties emphasizes a critical legal and ethical boundary that, when breached, could evoke significant emotional and community backlash. This situational context invites readers to consider the motivations and responsibilities of the developers (the Partners) in relation to broader community implications. The "Bigger Picture" encompasses not only the immediate effects of such construction decisions on individual property owners but also the long-term sustainability of community relationships, property values, and the overall integrity of local environmental practices. This reflection raises crucial questions about accountability, transparency, and the real impacts of development on community dynamics.
Next;
Crumble
Q's |
||||||||||||||||||||
